Monday, May 31, 2004

Nominations for WMANUS executive committee 2004/2005

This is the list of Nominations for election to the WMANUS executive committee for 2004/2005. Manifestoes are available on the WMANUS website.

Area Convenor - Training and Development
Gary Youens - Oxford and Cherwell College

Area Convenor - Campaigns And Communications
Helen Boyle - Birmingham University
Sarah Griffiths - Aston University

Treasurer & Secretary
Matthew Walsh - Aston University

Further Education Union Development Officer
Lucy Nobo - City of Wolverhampton College
Manishta Sunnia - Dudley College

Non Traditional Students' Officer
Jonathan Horan - WMANUS

Events Officer
Beccy Lawrance - Coventry University
Manishta Sunnia - Dudley College

Cultural Awareness Officer
Manishta Sunnia - Dudley College

Network Officer (5 Places)
Richard Angell - Birmingham University
David Pleavin - West Cheshire College
Adam Nazir Ahmed Teladia - Josiah Mason College
Manishta Sunnia - Dudley College

SWD Officer
No Nominations Received

Black Students Officer
Manishta Sunnia - Dudley College

Women's Officer
Manishta Sunnia - Dudley College

LGB Officer
Ryan Farrell - Aston University
Ciaran Osborne - Warwick University

Non-nominated positions
Nominations will open at conference for one Network Officer, and the Students with disabilities officer, nominations will also open for any other vacancies that should arise due to withdrawals. Nominations will also open for the Steering committee at conference.

Thursday, May 27, 2004

The European Union

I am sorry that I have not posted for a long time but with my first exam only being seventeen days away I have been busy with revision (I wish it was only revision that was keeping me busy). I know a lot has happen in the time that I have not been blogging hopefully at some point soon I will be able to cover some of the topics but for now I want to complete my rant about the European Union like I was saying I believe that The European Union is a way of tackling shared problems (environmental issues, international terrorism etc), upholding shared values such as liberty and equality, settling disputes between traditionally fractious neighbours and applying the rule of law to agreements that have been entered into.

During a debate on Britain’s membership of the European Economic Community and the European Union the euro sceptics in my history class started arguing that the European Union was undemocratic because un-elected officials make decisions in Brussels.

This is not true because the European Parliament is directly elected; its 626 Members are elected every five years under a system of proportional representation. The Council of the European Union (formerly known as The Council of Ministers) is made up of government ministers from each Member State and these governments would not participate if they did not have the consent of their citizens. The European Commission (made up of Commissioners appointed by the Member States governments/parliament) does not make any law. It just proposes laws for the European Parliament and the Council to agree, amend or reject, oversee the implementation of EU policies and the budget, enforce European law (jointly with the Court of Justice) and represent the EU on the international stage, for example, in trade negotiations. So the EU is democratic and it can be argued that to an extent the European Parliament elected using a proportional voting system is more democratic then the House of Commons or House of Lords. This happen to be their biggest argument and every time I made any other point they argued that the EU was undemocratic.

Their other argument happen to be that the European Union was out of date in a global world/market.

They happen to concede on this point when a friend argued that similar organisations exist throughout the world citing NAFTA, African Union and the League of Arab States as examples. I then argued that in a world where we share problems such as pollution, international terrorism, manipulation of the earths resources there certainly is a need for organisations such as the EU and if they can tackle these problems and keep peace between neighbouring nations such as France and Germany and help bring peace to non-member states such as the Balkans and Middle East then these organisations are needed.

They then argued that the EU created an unstable market, as there are different rates of growth, unemployment, balance of payment and inflation across the union. They argued that the European Central Bank which was unanswerable to anyone set the Interest Rates for the whole Euro zone which created instability as there were different types of economies across the union.

I argued that the different British regions had different economies and that at time when the South East enjoyed growth and low unemployment which in the long run could lead inflation, the North East or North West was not so lucky and due to the fear of inflation in the South East if the Bank of England would increase interest rates it would be detrimental to the other regions. If this is happening in Britain and has not yet caused any major problem I have no fear that this will occur across the union.

Their final argument happen to be the one that really made me laugh. They argued that the European Union created hostility between member states, their example happen to be that over the issue of military action in Iraq the relationship between member states became very bitter to the extent that it had consequences on other negations and even on last years Eurovision song contest.

For this firstly I have to say that last year Britain deserved nothing at the Eurovision song contest the song was rubbish and the performance was crap. The EU may lead to hostilities between member states but at least it has prevented a war between member states for the last fifty-nine years and we must remember that the two world wars were fought between European nations and led to the death of millions of people.
I then argued that history shows that the rivalry between Germany and France goes back a long way and at its peak resulted in war therefore when I see the German Chancellor and French President sitting around the same table discussing issues trying to come to a consensus and solve an issue it is much better then having them threatening the use of military force against the other.

The European Union has brought its member states security, over the past fifty nine years there has been no war between member states, the European Union allows it citizens to move around freely whether it be for business, work or leisure and the European Union has increased the number and range of jobs for its citizens while increasing the pool of labour for firms that operate within its borders.

The EU has, for almost half a century, been a highly effective stabilising influence in Europe. This has to continue, the European Union must be a force for peace and good. Britain must not be on the sidelines of this great organisation we must fully pleadge ourselves to the Europe Union and fully partipate in all its activities.

Sunday, May 23, 2004

Paul Keetch MP quoted in the Aston Labour Rose

Sorry, have not got much time so I just wanted to say that Mark and Martyn will be pleased to hear that Paul Keetch MP (Liberal Democrat, Defence Spokesman) has been quoted on the Aston Labour Rose.


Wednesday, May 19, 2004

REDUCING THE VOTING AGE TO 16

I do apologies for not completing my post on the European Union but have been a little busy and I promise I will do so when I have some free time.

For now could I just encourage supporters of Votes at 16 to encourage their local Member of Parliament to sign EDM 1139 REDUCING THE VOTING AGE TO 16. I did send my MP Khalid Mahmood MP (Birmingham, Perry Barr) of the Labour Party an email asking him to sign but he has still not replied to my email or signed the Early Day Motion but I do hope that will change soon.


Saturday, May 15, 2004

European Union

Sorry have not got much time but a combination of the Euro sceptics in my History class and the A Europe for Citizens: Our Role conference, which I attended last Saturday with Mark, convinced me to punish you with this rant.

The New Politics Network’s conference A Europe for Citizens: Our Role last Saturday attracted some high quality speakers, including Stephen Byers MP (Labour), Will Hutton (Work Foundation), Richard Corbett MEP (Labour), Lord Maclennan (Liberal Democrats), Jean Lambert MEP (Green), Richard Balfe MEP (Conservatives), Andrew Duff MEP (Liberal Democrats) and many others.

Having never heard most these people speak I have to say that I was impressed by almost all of them but my highlight had to be Lord Maclennan (Liberal Democrats) who’s work on issues relating to the British constitution never fail to impress me. I was also impressed with Will Hutton (Work Foundation) and Richard Corbett MEP (Labour) although Richard Corbett MEP did seem to interrupt everyone during the Where now for Britain and Europe? debate.

Stephen Byers MP delivered his speech very well but then again when does a New Labour Politician do bad job of a speech. He spoke about how pro-Europeans had to take the message of Europe to the wider public (I totally agreed) but then instead of going on and emphasising what we should be telling the public about Europe he finished which was very disappointing. With the BBC News camera crew there he had a great chance send a message out to the wider public but like most politicians of the day he stopped.

The European Union is a way of tackling shared problems (environmental issues, international terrorism etc), upholding shared values such as liberty and equality, settling disputes between traditionally fractious neighbours and applying the rule of law to agreements that have been entered into.

During a debate on Britain’s membership of the European Economic Community and the European Union the euro sceptics in my history class started arguing that the European Union was undemocratic because un-elected officials make decisions in Brussels. This is not true because The European Parliament is directly elected; its 626 Members are elected every five years under a system of proportional representation. The Council of the European Union (formerly known as The Council of Ministers) is made up of government ministers from each Member State and these governments would not participate if they did not have the consent of their citizens. The European Commission (made up of Commissioners appointed by the Member States governments/parliament) and does not make any law. It just proposes laws for the European Parliament and the Council to agree, amend or reject, oversee the implementation of EU policies and the budget, enforce European law (jointly with the Court of Justice) and represent the EU on the international stage, for example, in trade negotiations.

Sorry but unfortunately cannot continue with this for now but I will come back to it later.


Thursday, May 13, 2004

Website Referrers

Just been looking at the figuers for visitors to this blog and I have to say that visitors fellow LDYS bloggers blogs often visit this blog after theirs.

http://www.markramsden.blogspot.com/(33),
http://jadefarrington.blogspot.com/ (12),
http://www.cix.co.uk/~who/blog/      (7)
http://www.evilgermantechno.blogspot.com/ (6)
http://topicalfish.blogspot.com/   (6)
http://robtiffen.blogspot.com/ (5)

LDYS Forums

Sorry have not got much time to blog but I just wanted to say that if any LDYS types are interested in International Development someone has started a thread on the LDYS forum based on my rant about the Prime Minister’s Commission for Africa. So sign up to the forum and participate in some very interesting debates/discussion.

Wednesday, May 12, 2004

BIRMINGHAM FOCUS ON BLINDNESS Ultimate Zip-Line and Abseil Challenge!

BIRMINGHAM FOCUS ON BLINDNESS, in conjunction with THE MAILBOX, proudly presents, from the roof of the BIRMINGHAM MAILBOX one of the most exhilarating Zip-Line and Abseil events of the year.This once in a lifetime opportunity for you takes place on SATURDAY 24TH and SUNDAY 25TH JULY 2004.

Having done this previously I would certainly reccomed it to everyone.

If require any more information either email me of ring my frind Ann Isherwood at Birmingham Focus on Blindness on 0121 428 5069.

Over 400 people will be taking part in order to raise £60,000 for Birmingham Focus on Blindness, supporting the needs of blind and partially sighted children and adults in the Birmingham area.

Where does my money go?
Birmingham Focus on Blindness provides services and support for those with sight impairment and severe sight impairment in Birmingham. The services and support we provide ranges from information and practical advice, living aids, rehabilitation services, low vision assessment, volunteer support and multiple disability services. Your support helps us rebuild lives devastated by sight loss. It is our hope that this support helps enhance the quality of their lives and allows them to live more independently.Every fundraising event helps fund our vital work with blind and partially sighted people.

What is the minimum/maximum age for a participant?
There is no age limit, though children will have to have their disclaimer form signed by a parent or guardian.

This is the ultimate Zip-Line and Abseil challenge!

Could you do it?

For more details call Ann on 0121 428 5069
aaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

Just could not believe it. I was at my brothers house yesterday and happen to step on the scale to see if I have lost any weight recently but to my surprise my weight it up to 13 stones (I think that’s just over 80kgs).

Better start going out and delivering more Focus leaflets and I better get the Gym membership I have been promising myself for the last two years.

Monday, May 10, 2004

Prime Minister’s Commission for Africa

I welcome the Prime Ministers steps to try and improve the lives of people in Africa.

Having lived in Malawi (one Southern Africa’s poorest nations) for eleven months I think the more developed countries desperately need to help these poor countries tackle four major problems they have.

I believe that when the commission publishes its report next year during Britain's presidency of the G8 that will coincide with the 20th anniversary of the Live Aid concert it will find that the main problems in the African countries are corruption, ignorance, illness/diseases and poverty.

In relation to illness/diseases the developed countries need to start by helping the African countries in the fight against Aids because after all aids may kill far more people over the next 20 years than the bubonic plague ever did. In my eyes Aids is Mother Nature’s weapon of mass destruction.

Developed countries can help poorer countries such as Malawi, South Africa provide anti-retroviral drugs to prevent mother to child transmission-but the problem is not an easy matter of simply providing drugs, however cheap they are. The drugs will not conquer the epidemic or do the trick. The drugs are far too complicated to take and need to be backed by things that are simple for us in the west, such as good nutrition, if they are to work.

The African countries need good health workers who are educated in the delivery of Aids drugs if those drugs are to be any good at all. If we do not have such workers, the drugs will be taken improperly, resistance to the disease will develop and we will have to start all over again.

Vaccines are the ultimate weapons against any infectious disease, and the global fund, the Americans, the Gates Foundation, and the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative have done some worthy work. Trials of aids vaccines are going on all over the world, but there are not enough of them. We must ensure that funds enhance research into aids vaccines because that will lead to the end of the epidemic, as it did for smallpox and as it soon will do for polio.

Also I hear that African countries spend approximately $14 billion a year on servicing their debt. The global fund has estimated that those countries need roughly $10 billion to do something that will have an impact on the aids epidemic. I hope the commission will look at how Britain can help with that after all aids destroys economically active people in the population and will destroy the ability of any country to service its debt because fewer people will be working.

The distribution of condoms from the USA amounts in Botswana to one condom per annum per man. How many people reading this blog can cope with that? So lets get serious about this epidemic and work with our colleagues in the G8, Commonwealth, and European Union and try making life easier for those who cannot do it themselves.

Apart from aids other illnesses such as Yellow Fever (eventually leads to death), Hepatitis A (recovery takes about 2 months), Malaria, Polio (eventually leads to death), Tetanus, Typhoid etc also cause major problems in Africa. If an economically active person in the population contracts one of these illnesses the family will naturally see their income fall as this person will be unable to work for sometime which could easily lead to them loosing their job (I know that would have been the case where I worked). Then their costs will rise, as they have to pay for the medical treatment that their relative receives.

A way of trying to reduce the cases of these illnesses is to educate the population. For example just informing the local population that the Hepatitis A virus is picked up from contaminated food and water or teaching the local population that they should avoid unpeeled fruit, badly cooked meat, untreated milk etc and that they should purify water or make sure it is clean.

Educating the local people should not only be about trying to help them prevent the spread of illness but also about making them economically active and able to compete for the best jobs in their economy. As most people start life in poverty in most these countries it might be worth their local education authorities and their international supporters coming together to develop more vocational training and education for young and old alike so that people can earn while they learn thus not giving one up for the other.

Unfortunately from my experience Malawi and Africa as a whole to an extent has a massive problem with corruption. This is from the police officer at the local checkpoint allowing you to get away without checking your driving licence because you have offered him something as small as a packet of flour or a drink to some customs and excise officers accepting bribes of £100-200 (which is their monthly wage) to allow you to import goods declaring a very small proportion of the goods real values. I know in Malawi they have established the anti-corruption bureau to tackle corruption but from my experience it does very little. For example in the area where I worked I along with everyone else knew that most if not all goods that came into the country were due to a corrupt customs and excise officer somewhere or the other but I very rarely saw any anti-corruption bureau staff there. If countries like Malawi wish to increase the income they can get from people doing business and working in their country they desperately need to cut down on the corruption that exists in the civil service and maximise their revenue.

I think you will admit that if we can help people in Africa tackle their health problems (illnesses) that we can fight both (ignorance and poverty) the other evils of life as I like to call them because fit people are economically active they can provide for themselves and because can use their income to educate themselves or their younger brother/sisters or children.

I hope that when the commission publishes its report next year during Britain's presidency of the G8 it calls on all the different organisations, which can help Africa to come together and tackle the problems facing Africa. I also hope that with senior African figures such as KY Amoako, Dr. Anna Kajumulo, Benjamin Mkapa, Trevor Manuel, Meles Zenawi, Dr William S Kalema, Fola Adeola and Linah Mohohlo African countries will look at the findings of the commission as something for their benefit and work with others to implement the findings of the commission. With senior African figures joined by others from Europe and North America I hope the commission does not become another talk shop which spends a lot of money putting together a report which then does nothing for African countries desperate for help.
Prime Minister’s Commission for Africa

I welcome the Prime Ministers steps to try and improve the lives of people in Africa.

Having lived in Malawi (one Southern Africa’s poorest nations) for eleven months I think the more developed countries desperately need to help these poor countries tackle four major problems they have.

I believe that when the commission publishes its report next year during Britain's presidency of the G8 that will coincide with the 20th anniversary of the Live Aid concert it will find that the main problems in the African countries are corruption, ignorance, illness/diseases and poverty.

In relation to illness/diseases the developed countries need to start by helping the African countries in the fight against Aids because after all aids may kill far more people over the next 20 years than the bubonic plague ever did. In my eyes Aids is Mother Nature’s weapon of mass destruction.

Developed countries can help poorer countries such as Malawi, South Africa provide anti-retroviral drugs to prevent mother to child transmission-but the problem is not an easy matter of simply providing drugs, however cheap they are. The drugs will not conquer the epidemic or do the trick. The drugs are far too complicated to take and need to be backed by things that are simple for us in the west, such as good nutrition, if they are to work.

The African countries need good health workers who are educated in the delivery of Aids drugs if those drugs are to be any good at all. If we do not have such workers, the drugs will be taken improperly, resistance to the disease will develop and we will have to start all over again.

Vaccines are the ultimate weapons against any infectious disease, and the global fund, the Americans, the Gates Foundation, and the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative have done some worthy work. Trials of aids vaccines are going on all over the world, but there are not enough of them. We must ensure that funds enhance research into aids vaccines because that will lead to the end of the epidemic, as it did for smallpox and as it soon will do for polio.

Also I hear that African countries spend approximately $14 billion a year on servicing their debt. The global fund has estimated that those countries need roughly $10 billion to do something that will have an impact on the aids epidemic. I hope the commission will look at how Britain can help with that after all aids destroys economically active people in the population and will destroy the ability of any country to service its debt because fewer people will be working.

The distribution of condoms from the USA amounts in Botswana to one condom per annum per man. How many people reading this blog can cope with that? So lets get serious about this epidemic and work with our colleagues in the G8, Commonwealth, and European Union and try making life easier for those who cannot do it themselves.

Apart from aids other illnesses such as Yellow Fever (eventually leads to death), Hepatitis A (recovery takes about 2 months), Malaria, Polio (eventually leads to death), Tetanus, Typhoid etc also cause major problems in Africa. If an economically active person in the population contracts one of these illnesses the family will naturally see their income fall as this person will be unable to work for sometime which could easily lead to them loosing their job (I know that would have been the case where I worked). Then their costs will rise, as they have to pay for the medical treatment that their relative receives.

A way of trying to reduce the cases of these illnesses is to educate the population. For example just informing the local population that the Hepatitis A virus is picked up from contaminated food and water or teaching the local population that they should avoid unpeeled fruit, badly cooked meat, untreated milk etc and that they should purify water or make sure it is clean.

Educating the local people should not only be about trying to help them prevent the spread of illness but also about making them economically active and able to compete for the best jobs in their economy. As most people start life in poverty in most these countries it might be worth their local education authorities and their international supporters coming together to develop more vocational training and education for young and old alike so that people can earn while they learn thus not giving one up for the other.

Unfortunately from my experience Malawi and Africa as a whole to an extent has a massive problem with corruption. This is from the police officer at the local checkpoint allowing you to get away without checking your driving licence because you have offered him something as small as a packet of flour or a drink to some customs and excise officers accepting bribes of £100-200 (which is their monthly wage) to allow you to import goods declaring a very small proportion of the goods real values. I know in Malawi they have established the anti-corruption bureau to tackle corruption but from my experience it does very little. For example in the area where I worked I along with everyone else knew that most if not all goods that came into the country were due to a corrupt customs and excise officer somewhere or the other but I very rarely saw any anti-corruption bureau staff there. If countries like Malawi wish to increase the income they can get from people doing business and working in their country they desperately need to cut down on the corruption that exists in the civil service and maximise their revenue.

I think you will admit that if we can help people in Africa tackle their health problems (illnesses) that we can fight both (ignorance and poverty) the other evils of life as I like to call them because fit people are economically active they can provide for themselves and because can use their income to educate themselves or their younger brother/sisters or children.

I hope that when the commission publishes its report next year during Britain's presidency of the G8 it calls on all the different organisations, which can help Africa to come together and tackle the problems facing Africa. I also hope that with senior African figures such as KY Amoako, Dr. Anna Kajumulo, Benjamin Mkapa, Trevor Manuel, Meles Zenawi, Dr William S Kalema, Fola Adeola and Linah Mohohlo African countries will look at the findings of the commission as something for their benefit and work with others to implement the findings of the commission. With senior African figures joined by others from Europe and North America I hope the commission does not become another talk shop which spends a lot of money putting together a report which then does nothing for African countries desperate for help.

Friday, May 07, 2004

Comment Boxs

I have just added comment box on to the blog so if anyone wishes to make any comments about my blog please do not hesitate to do so.

I would also like to take this opportunity to remind readers that the views on this blog are personal and should not be assumed to reflect the policy of any of the organisations I am associated to. Please note that I may publish any emails I receive with reference to this site (although I will not publish email addresses).

Thanks I hope you enjoy.
Prime Minister’s Commission for Africa Part 2

I am sorry I have been unable to update this blog any sooner but I have been a little occupied with a few things over the last two days.

Continuing with the rant on the Prime Ministers Commission for Africa I have to start by saying that having read the profiles of all the commissioners I am very impressed by Dr. Anna Kajumulo Tibaijuka. Dr. Tibaijuka holds a Doctorate of Science in Agricultural Economics from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Uppsala. From 1993 to 1998, when she joined UNCTAD, Dr. Tibaijuka was Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Dar-es-Salaam. During this period Dr. Tibaijuka was also a member of the Tanzanian Government delegation to several United Nations Summits. At these conferences, Dr. Tibaijuka was an active member of the Civil Society and NGO Forums. At the World Food Summit in Rome, Dr. Tibaijuka was elected Coordinator for Eastern Africa in the Network for Food Security, Trade and Sustainable Development (COASAD). Dr. Tibaijuka has also been a Board Member of UNESCO's International Scientific Advisory Board since November 1997. Dr. Tibaijuka is the founding Chairperson of the Tanzanian National Women's Council (BAWATA), an independent, non-politically aligned, organisation advocating for women's rights to land, inheritance and social services. Dr. Tibaijuka is also founding Chairperson of the Barbro Johansson Girls Education Trust, which is dedicated to promoting high standards of education amongst girls in Tanzania and in Africa. Dr. Tibaijuka is also the convener of Tanzania's Local Entrepreneurs Initiative (TALE), a voluntary group mobilising and assisting Tanzanians to form joint venture companies with overseas investors. Dr. Tibaijuka has been a Board Member of the Tanzania Economic Policy Development and Management Foundation and is a Director of a number of private companies dedicated to encouraging entrepreneurship and efficiency in the marketing of agricultural commodities. Dr Tibaijuka speaks English, Swahili, Haya, Swedish and some French. She is a widow and has four children. How does someone manage all that in a lifetime? Where do they get the enthusiasm? Where do they get the dedication? Where does the energy come from?

The bulk of my last rant was concentrated on how I believe African countries can be helped by the more developed countries to deal with the aids crisis but apart from aids other illnesses such as Yellow Fever (eventually leads to death), Hepatitis A (recovery takes about 2 months), Malaria, Polio (eventually leads to death), Tetanus, Typhoid etc also cause major problems in Africa. If an economically active person in the population contracts one of these illnesses the family will naturally see their income fall as this person will be unable to work for sometime which could easily lead to them loosing their job, I know that would have been the case where I worked. Then their costs will rise, as they have to pay for the medical treatment that their relative receives.

A way of trying to reduce the cases of these illnesses is to educate the population. For example just informing the local population that the Hepatitis A virus is picked up from contaminated food and water or teaching the local population that they should avoid unpeeled fruit, badly cooked meat, untreated milk etc and that they should purify water or make sure it is clean.

Again I am sorry but I am out of time but I have to go for now. I will try continuing with this rant later. Unfortunately it will not be tomorrow as Mark and me are off to London for A Europe for Citizens: Our Role organised by Charter 88 and the New Politics Network.

Wednesday, May 05, 2004

Prime Minister’s Commission for Africa

I read in today’s Guardian that the Prime Minister’s Commission for Africa met for the first time yesterday. I welcome the Prime Ministers steps to try and improve the lives of people in Africa.

Having lived in Malawi (one the poorest Southern African nation) for eleven months I think the more developed countries desperately need to help these poor countries tackle four major problems they have.

I believe that when the commission publishes its report next year during Britain's presidency of the G8 which will coincide with the 20th anniversary of the Live Aid concert it will find that the main problems in the African countries are illness, ignorance and corruption which lead to massive gap between the rich and the poor with the poor living in absolute poverty.

In relation to illness the developed countries should start by helping the African countries in the fight against Aids because after all aids may kill far more people over the next 20 years than the bubonic plague ever did. Aids is mother natures weapon of mass destruction.
We should start by helping developing countries to provide anti-retroviral drugs to prevent mother to child transmission-but the problem is not an easy matter of simply providing drugs, however cheap they are. The drugs will not conquer the epidemic or do the trick. The drugs are far too complicated to take and need to be backed by things that are simple for us in the west, such as good nutrition, if they are to work.
These countries need good health workers who are educated in the delivery of Aids drugs if those drugs are to be any good at all. If we do not have such workers, the drugs will be taken improperly, resistance to the disease will develop and we will have to start all over again.
Vaccines are the ultimate weapons against any infectious disease, and the global fund, the Americans, the Gates Foundation, which has contributed a lot, and the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative have done some worthy work. Trials of AIDS vaccines are going on all over the world, but there are not enough of them. We must ensure that funds enhance research into Aids vaccines because that will lead to the end of the epidemic, as it did for smallpox and as it soon will do for polio.
Also I hear that African countries spend approximately $14 billion a year on servicing their debt. The global fund has estimated that those countries need roughly $10 billion to do something that will have an impact on the AIDS epidemic. I hope the commission will look at how we as a country can help with that after all Aids destroys economically active people in the population and will destroy the ability of any country to service its debt because fewer people will be working.
And finally I would like bring to an abrupt end this rant by saying that the distribution of condoms from the USA amounts in Botswana to one condom per annum per man. How many people reading this blog can cope with that?

I hope to continue with this rant when I have some more time.

Tuesday, May 04, 2004

Brum selected to host Euro Indoor Champs 2007

Birmingham’s National Indoor Arena will host the European Indoor Championships for Athletics in March 2007.

Birmingham was chosen ahead of Hungarian capital Budapest and Finnish capital Helsinki.

I am sure Birmingham’s excellent track record when it comes to staging international sports events helped to convince the European Athletic Association (EAA). By choosing Birmingham the EEA have made sure that the 2007 Championships will be the best ever.

The event has an estimated economic impact of £3 million and is expected to attract up to 1,000 athletes and officials from around 40 European countries, along with approximately 850 media personal.

I hope that this impact of £3million is not only on the city centre which is developing well but also on inner city areas such as Aston/Handsworth where I live.

The success of the World Indoor Championships, which Birmingham hosted just over thirteen months ago, will have no doubt helped convince the EAA to select Birmingham as the host city.

P.s. Mark has a good piece on Birmingham.
Welcome Rob

Rob Tiffen who earlier this year was elected as a General Executive Member for LDYS has started a blog.

Saturday, May 01, 2004

New Peers

Air Marshal Sir Timothy Garden former Assistant Chief of Defence Staff is one of the eight new LibDems new working peers being appointed to the House of Lords today.

Congratulations to him and Sir David Alliance (chairman, N Brown Group), Jane Bonham Carter (television documentary maker and former Liberal Democrat director of communications), Hugh Dykes (former Conservative MP for Harrow East ), Kishwer Falkner (chief executive, Students Partnership Worldwide), Rabbi Dame Julia Neuberger (writer and broadcaster), The Reverend John Roberts (former Methodist Minister for Wales) and Sir Iain Vallance (vice-chairman of the Royal Bank of Scotland and former chairman of BT).

I look forward to seeing them doing their best for the Liberal Democrats in the House of Lords.

Got to go now got some Focus leaflets to deliver.